Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664134›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2023

The Muddle of Myoclonus: Many Guises, 2 Disciplines, Consensus Needed.

Sterre Van Der Veen, Marina A J Tijssen, Samuel F Berkovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sterre Van Der VeenDepartment of Neurology (SVDV, MAJT), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen; Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen (SVDV, MAJT), University Medical Centre Groningen; and Epilepsy Research Centre (SVDV, SFB), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-2087
Marina A J TijssenDepartment of Neurology (SVDV, MAJT), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen; Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen (SVDV, MAJT), University Medical Centre Groningen; and Epilepsy Research Centre (SVDV, SFB), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-571X
Samuel F BerkovicDepartment of Neurology (SVDV, MAJT), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen; Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen (SVDV, MAJT), University Medical Centre Groningen; and Epilepsy Research Centre (SVDV, SFB), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-841X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myoclonus is often approached in different ways by epileptologists and movement disorder specialists, leading to confusion in the literature. Multiplicity and inconsistency over the past 2 centuries resulted in a lack of precision and ambiguity of the terminology. We show that this is a current problem in which one phenomenon has been described with many terms and vice versa. Of more importance, we discuss the conceptualization of myoclonus from perspectives of both fields and focus on the borderland that exists, especially in the spectrum of cortical and epileptic myoclonus. By giving 2 examples, we illustrate the conundrum: the spectrum of progressive myoclonus epilepsies and progressive myoclonic ataxias and "cortical tremor" observed in familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy or familial adult myoclonic epilepsy. We attempt to facilitate to bridge these subspecialties and form the base for a uniform understanding to take this issue forward toward future classifications, discussions, and scientific research.

Identifiers

PMID37664134
PMCPMC10473854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.