ArticleUrology annals
Varicocelectomy for scrotal pain: Is it effective?
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why Varicoceles Recur: Missed Venous Anatomy and Contemporary Strategies for Salvage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Varicocelectomy is the prevailing management of scrotal pain secondary to varicocele. However, the literature is controversial on this topic. Some data showed that pain may persist after the surgery even if the varicocele is not detected postoperatively. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to identify the effect of varicocelectomy in patients with chronic scrotal pain, to report the association between the clinical grade and postoperative pain resolution, and to identify the need for a secondary procedure after varicocelectomy to control the pain. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 47 patients who underwent varicocelectomy between March 2016 and December 2018. Results: Postoperatively, the pain totally resolved after surgery in 64.3% of patients with scrotal pain; it improved in 21.4%, 11.9% have persistent pain, and the pain got worse in only 2.4%. Our study showed 100% complete resolution or improvement with Grade I, 85.7% in Grade II, and 81.3% in Grade III. In addition, all patients who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy had pain that either completely resolved or improved postoperatively. On the other hand, all patients who had persistent pain or pain worsening postoperatively had unilateral varicocelectomy. An additional intervention for postoperative pain control was needed in only 14% of patients, 7% of them underwent embolization, 4.7% had a cord block, and 2.3% were sent to a pain clinic. Conclusion: Varicocelectomy offers good outcomes in most patients with varicocele-related scrotal pain. The most significant predictor for success was low grade and bilaterality. However, there is a subset of patients whose symptoms will not improve postoperatively. Careful preoperative counseling and expectation management are crucial when discussing surgical options for those patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.