Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664069›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Baseline whole-lung CT features deriving from deep learning and radiomics: prediction of benign and malignant pulmonary ground-glass nodules.

Wenjun Huang, Heng Deng, Zhaobin Li, Zhanda Xiong, Taohu Zhou, Yanming Ge, Jing Zhang, Wenbin Jing, Yayuan Geng, Xiang Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A CT-Based Lung Radiomics Nomogram for Classifying the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wenjun HuangDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Heng DengSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaobin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zhanda XiongDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Medical Imaging, Tron Technology, Shanghai, China.
Taohu ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yanming GeSchool of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's hospital of Deyang, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Wenbin JingDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's hospital of Deyang, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Yayuan GengClinical Research Institute, Shukun (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wenting TuDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Peng DongSchool of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Shiyuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Li FanDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate the model for predicting benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) based on the whole-lung baseline CT features deriving from deep learning and radiomics. Methods: This retrospective study included 385 GGNs from 3 hospitals, confirmed by pathology. We used 239 GGNs from Hospital 1 as the training and internal validation set; 115 and 31 GGNs from Hospital 2 and Hospital 3 as the external test sets 1 and 2, respectively. An additional 32 stable GGNs from Hospital 3 with more than five years of follow-up were used as the external test set 3. We evaluated clinical and morphological features of GGNs at baseline chest CT and extracted the whole-lung radiomics features simultaneously. Besides, baseline whole-lung CT image features are further assisted and extracted using the convolutional neural network. We used the back-propagation neural network to construct five prediction models based on different collocations of the features used for training. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the prediction performance among the five models. The Delong test was used to compare the differences in AUC between models pairwise. Results: The model integrated clinical-morphological features, whole-lung radiomic features, and whole-lung image features (CMRI) performed best among the five models, and achieved the highest AUC in the internal validation set, external test set 1, and external test set 2, which were 0.886 (95% CI: 0.841-0.921), 0.830 (95%CI: 0.749-0.893) and 0.879 (95%CI: 0.712-0.968), respectively. In the above three sets, the differences in AUC between the CMRI model and other models were significant (all Conclusion: The baseline whole-lung CT features were feasible to predict the benign and malignant of GGNs, which is helpful for more refined management of GGNs.

Indexed as

deep learningground-glass noduleslung cancerradiomicstomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37664069
PMCPMC10470826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.