Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms.

Viktor Grünwald, Thomas Powles, Masatoshi Eto, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Sun Young Rha, Camillo Porta, Robert Motzer, Thomas E Hutson, María José Méndez-Vidal, Sung-Hoo Hong and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02811861 (A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus or Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02811861 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus or Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (CLEAR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Inc.Ran2016 to 2027Enrolled1,069ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsLenvatinib, Everolimus, Pembrolizumab, Sunitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Final analysis of nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma from the randomized phase III CheckMate 9ER trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: New Biologic Understanding Leads to Therapeutic Advances.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 19 institutions in 11 countries.

Viktor GrünwaldClinic for Medical Oncology and Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute and the Royal Free Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Masatoshi EtoDepartment of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Evgeny KopyltsovState Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia.
Sun Young RhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Camillo PortaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Bari, Italy.
Robert MotzerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Thomas E HutsonMedical Oncology, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX, United States.
María José Méndez-VidalDepartment of Oncology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC) Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Sung-Hoo HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eric WinquistDepartment of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Jeffrey C GohICON Research, South Brisbane & University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Pablo MarotoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Tomas BuchlerDepartment of Oncology, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Toshio TakagiDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Joseph E BurgentsGlobal Clinical Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Rodolfo PeriniClinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Cixin HeBiostatistics, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, United States.
Chinyere E OkparaClinical Research, Eisai Ltd., Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Jodi McKenzieClinical Research, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, United States.
Toni K ChoueiriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Eisai (United States) · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USCatholic University of Korea · KRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEisai (United Kingdom) · GBEssen University Hospital · DEHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESKyushu University · JPMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USState Healthcare Institution "Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary" · RUTexas Oncology · USThe University of Queensland · AUThomayer University Hospital · CZTokyo Women's Medical University · JPUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITWestern University · CAYonsei University Health System · KR

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Prognostic features including presence and/or site of baseline metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features have been associated with disease and treatment success. This subsequent analysis explores outcomes in patients with or without specific prognostic features. Methods: In CLEAR, patients with clear cell RCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg/day) plus everolimus (5 mg/day), or sunitinib alone (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). In this report, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were all assessed in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and the sunitinib arms, based on baseline features: lung metastases, bone metastases, liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid histology. Results: In all the assessed subgroups, median PFS was longer with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab than with sunitinib treatment, notably among patients with baseline bone metastases (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) and patients with sarcomatoid features (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.84). Median OS favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib irrespective of metastatic lesions at baseline, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features. Of interest, among patients with baseline bone metastases the HR for survival was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83) and among patients with sarcomatoid features the HR for survival was 0.91 (95% CI 0.32-2.58); though for many groups, median OS was not reached. ORR also favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib across all subgroups; similarly, complete responses also followed this pattern. Conclusion: Efficacy outcomes improved following treatment with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in patients with RCC-irrespective of the presence or absence of baseline lung metastases, baseline bone metastases, baseline liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, or sarcomatoid features. These findings corroborate those of the primary CLEAR study analysis in the overall population and support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard of care in 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02811861.

Indexed as

bone metastaseslenvatinibliver metastaseslung metastasespembrolizumabrenal cell carcinomasarcomatoid histologysunitinib

Identifiers

PMID37664025
PMCPMC10471185
OpenAlexW4385949824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.