Reassessment of hyperautofluorescent rings in retinitis pigmentosa using novel retinal imaging techniques.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Chorioretinal Atrophy after Voretigene Neparvovec Therapy in <italic>RPE65</italic> Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Disease: Longitudinal Characterization in Multimodal Imaging.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2026
   Article
2. Safety and efficacy of CRISPR-mediated genome ablation of VEGFA as a treatment for choroidal neovascularization in nonhuman primate eyes.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
   Article
3. Report of a Rare Syndromic Retinal Dystrophy: Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy (Jeune Syndrome)Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.