Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663966›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Usefulness of the cachexia index as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.

Keigo Nakashima, Koichiro Haruki, Teppei Kamada, Junji Takahashi, Yuichi Nakaseko, Hironori Ohdaira, Kenei Furukawa, Yutaka Suzuki, Toru Ikegami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of anamorelin on body weight in patients with gastric cancer-associated cachexia: an observational study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keigo NakashimaDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.
Koichiro HarukiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-3228
Teppei KamadaDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-6176
Junji TakahashiDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.
Yuichi NakasekoDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.
Hironori OhdairaDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.
Kenei FurukawaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-6417
Yutaka SuzukiDepartment of Surgery International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Tochigi Japan.
Toru IkegamiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5792-5045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Cachexia is associated with the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. The cachexia index (CXI) is a novel biomarker of cachexia associated with the prognosis for certain cancers. This study analyzed the relationship between CXI with long-term outcomes of gastric cancer patients. Methods: We included 175 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy at our hospital between January 2011 and October 2019. The CXI was calculated using skeletal muscle index, serum albumin level, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The prognostic value of CXI was investigated by univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression models adjusting for potential confounders. Results: In the multivariate analyses, tumor location (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.49; Conclusions: Cachexia index is associated with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer, suggesting the utility of comprehensive assessment using nutritional, physical, and inflammatory status.

Indexed as

cachexiagastric cancerneutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratioserum albumin

Identifiers

PMID37663966
PMCPMC10472360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.