Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663953›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2023

α-Blocker Use in Hemodialysis: The Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

Ken Iseri, Chisato Miyakoshi, Nobuhiko Joki, Yoshihiro Onishi, Shingo Fukuma, Hirokazu Honda, Kazuhiko Tsuruya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ken IseriDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chisato MiyakoshiDepartment of Research Support, Center for Clinical Research and Innovation, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Nobuhiko JokiDivision of Nephrology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro OnishiInstitute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research (iHope International), Kyoto, Japan.
Shingo FukumaHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirokazu HondaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko TsuruyaDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Showa University · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPNara Medical University · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Despite α-blockers' use for hypertension as add-on therapy in patients treated with hemodialysis, scant information is available on their association, particularly with safety, in these patients. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: patients treated with hemodialysis and receiving antihypertensive agents in the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study, phases 4-6, were analyzed. Exposure: Primary exposure was the prescription of α-blocking antihypertensive agents at baseline. Outcomes: Incident fractures, falls, and all-cause mortality. Analytical Approach: Multivariable Cox and modified Poisson regression analysis. Results: Of 5,149 patients treated with hemodialysis (mean age, 65 years; 68% men) receiving antihypertensive drugs, 717 (14%) received α-blocking agents. During a mean follow-up period of 2.0 years, 247 fractures, 525 falls, and 498 deaths occurred. Multivariable analysis showed no significant association of α-blocker use and increased risk of fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.61-1.38]), falls (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.74-1.20]), or all-cause deaths (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.64-1.20]) compared with α-blocker nonuse. α-Blocker use was, however, significantly associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in the subgroup analysis, for example, patients who were older (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.51-0.99]), were women (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.48-0.95]), or reported a history of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48-0.95]) or a predialysis blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.49-0.98]). Limitations: Selection bias cannot be ruled out given the prevalent user analysis. Conclusions: No significant association between α-blocker use and the risk of worse safety-related outcomes was seen, indicating that clinicians may safely prescribe α-blockers to patients receiving hemodialysis who require blood pressure lowering. Plain-Language Summary: α-Blockers have been generally reserved for use as add-on therapy for resistant or refractory hypertension. However, little is known about the safety of α-blockers in patients treated by hemodialysis. We analyzed 5,149 patients receiving hemodialysis in Japan who were receiving antihypertensive drugs from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. The results showed no significant increase in the risk of fractures, falls, or deaths for patients using α-blockers compared with those who did not, suggesting that α-blockers may be safely prescribed for patients receiving hemodialysis who need to lower their blood pressure.

Indexed as

dialysisfallfracturehypertensionα-blocker

Identifiers

PMID37663953
PMCPMC10470217
OpenAlexW4383102390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.