Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663920›Full record

ReviewInfectious Disease Modelling2023

Hypothesis testing of Poisson rates in COVID-19 offspring distributions.

Rui Luo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rui LuoDepartment of Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Town, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we undertake the task of hypothesis testing in the context of Poisson-distributed data. The primary objective of our investigation is to ascertain whether two distinct sets of discrete data share the same Poisson rate. We delve into a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of various frequentist and Bayesian methodologies specifically designed to address this problem. Among these are the conditional test, the likelihood ratio test, and the Bayes factor. Additionally, we employ the posterior predictive

Indexed as

Bayes factorCOVID-19Hypothesis testingPoisson distributionPosterior predictivep-Value

Identifiers

PMID37663920
PMCPMC10469988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.