ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023
The Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Chronic Actinic Dermatitis: A Case Series.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extended treatment of abrocitinib: evaluation of efficacy and safety in chronic actinic dermatitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term Remission of Severe and Refractory Chronic Actinic Dermatosis with Dupilumab: A Case Report with Review of the Literature.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although dupilumab is an effective treatment approach for chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) in some cases, its effectiveness and safety in CAD have not been sufficiently assessed. Purpose: Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with recalcitrant CAD was performed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CAD patients treated with dupilumab. Data regarding demographics were collected, and disease severity scores were assessed using the following: Clinical Severity Score of CAD (CSS-CAD), Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-itch scores. Results: After 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant decrease in disease severity scores of 16 CAD patients. Only one patient achieved a good response and most of the patients (62.5%, 10/16) had no significant symptom improvement after 4 weeks of treatment. However, after 12 weeks of treatment, 43.75% (7/16) of the patients reached excellent response (>75% improvement of CSS-CAD), 31.25% (5/16) good response (50%-75% improvement of CSS-CAD), 6.25% (1/16) partial response (25%-50% improvement of CSS-CAD), and only 18.75% (3/16) no response (<25% improvement of CSS-CAD). One patient complained of injection site reaction at the first injection. Conclusion: This study supports dupilumab as an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recalcitrant CAD. Patients may require at least 4 weeks of treatment before the partial response is noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.