Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663797›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2023

Predictive Clinical Neuroscience Portal (PCNportal): instant online access to research-grade normative models for clinical neuroscientists.

Pieter Barkema, Saige Rutherford, Hurng-Chun Lee, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Hannah Savage, Christian Beckmann, Andre Marquand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Lifespan Normative Modeling of Brain Microstructure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mapping Cerebellar Morphology in 15q11.2 CNV Carriers Using Normative Modeling.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pieter BarkemaRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saige RutherfordRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hurng-Chun LeeRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Seyed Mostafa KiaRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-814X
Hannah SavageRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christian BeckmannRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andre MarquandRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5903-203X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The neurobiology of mental disorders remains poorly understood despite substantial scientific efforts, due to large clinical heterogeneity and to a lack of tools suitable to map individual variability. Normative modeling is one recently successful framework that can address these problems by comparing individuals to a reference population. The methodological underpinnings of normative modelling are, however, relatively complex and computationally expensive. Our research group has developed the python-based normative modelling package Predictive Clinical Neuroscience toolkit (PCNtoolkit) which provides access to many validated algorithms for normative modelling. PCNtoolkit has since proven to be a strong foundation for large scale normative modelling, but still requires significant computation power, time and technical expertise to develop. Methods: To address these problems, we introduce PCNportal. PCNportal is an online platform integrated with PCNtoolkit that offers access to pre-trained research-grade normative models estimated on tens of thousands of participants, without the need for computation power or programming abilities. PCNportal is an easy-to-use web interface that is highly scalable to large user bases as necessary. Finally, we demonstrate how the resulting normalized deviation scores can be used in a clinical application through a schizophrenia classification task applied to cortical thickness and volumetric data from the longitudinal Northwestern University Schizophrenia Data and Software Tool (NUSDAST) dataset. Results: At each longitudinal timepoint, the transferred normative models achieved a mean[std. dev.] explained variance of 9.4[8.8]%, 9.2[9.2]%, 5.6[7.4]% respectively in the control group and 4.7[5.5]%, 6.0[6.2]%, 4.2[6.9]% in the schizophrenia group. Diagnostic classifiers achieved AUC of 0.78, 0.76 and 0.71 respectively. Conclusions: This replicates the utility of normative models for diagnostic classification of schizophrenia and showcases the use of PCNportal for clinical neuroimaging. By facilitating and speeding up research with high-quality normative models, this work contributes to research in inter-individual variability, clinical heterogeneity and precision medicine.

Indexed as

brainchartsbrain growth chartingnormative modellingPCNtoolkit

Identifiers

PMID37663797
PMCPMC10474337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.