ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Removing 216 sharp metal foreign objects from the digestive tract of a 30-year-old male: case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acuphagia with sequential ingestion of sharp metallic objects and a magnet, causing intestinal bezoar, perforation, and peritonitis: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Removing 216 sharp metal foreign objects from the digestive tract of a 30-year-old male: case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Foreign body (FB) ingestion and its complications are abundant in emergency departments. This potentially severe problem had a peak incidence in children aged 6 months to 6 years. Intentional adult cases are voluntary and more common in prisoners and people with psychiatric problems. However, most patients (90%) remain asymptomatic, and these pass through the body spontaneously. Case presentation: The authors report a case of surgically removing plenteous sharp-pointed metallic foreign bodies ingested by a young male deaf-mute bipolar schizoaffective patient from his stomach, intestine, and rectum. Furthermore, the authors have reviewed the available literature for similar cases. Clinical discussion: Less than 1% of patients need surgical removal, 10-20% need to be taken out endoscopically, and the remaining pass spontaneously. Plain radiography is the most available imaging modality detecting the number, material, and estimated place of the alimentary canal trapped. Conclusion: For the risk of perforation, migration, and peritonitis, surgery is indicated in such situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.