Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663728›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Exploring the transformative influence of neuroplasticity on stroke rehabilitation: a narrative review of current evidence.

Nicholas Aderinto, Muili O AbdulBasit, Gbolahan Olatunji, Temilade Adejumo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07150325 (Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07150325 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke PatientsArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Benefits and Importance of Early Rehabilitation in Patients After Stroke.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Robotic rehabilitation with the LokomatFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Corticomuscular coupling study for post-stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas AderintoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso.
Muili O AbdulBasitDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso.
Gbolahan OlatunjiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Temilade AdejumoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso.
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology · NGUniversity of Ilorin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to assess the role of neuroplasticity in facilitating stroke recovery and identify the challenges and limitations associated with its implementation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies, which were meticulously evaluated to determine the potential solutions for effectively harnessing neuroplasticity. The results indicate that neuroplasticity holds significant promise in stroke rehabilitation; however, individual variability in response to interventions, timing and duration of interventions and sociocultural and clinical factors pose challenges. Tailoring interventions to individual patient characteristics is crucial for optimising the impact of neuroplasticity. Despite challenges and limitations, the transformative potential of neuroplasticity in stroke rehabilitation is undeniable. The abstract concludes by emphasising the importance of a comprehensive understanding of individual variability, optimising intervention timing and duration and considering sociocultural and clinical factors. Future research and clinical practice should prioritise personalised interventions and interdisciplinary collaborations to fully exploit the vast potential of neuroplasticity in stroke recovery.

Indexed as

neuroplasticityrehabilitationstroketransformation

Identifiers

PMID37663728
PMCPMC10473303
OpenAlexW4385762932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.