ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Donor's ability to comprehend and carefully assess the benefits and risks of donation in living donor liver transplantation: a Pakistani perspective - a short communication.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients unlikely to obtain deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) are offered living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as an alternative. The success of LDLT is bound to the availability of altruistic donors who undergo smooth and safe surgery. Donor morbidity is reported to be up to 20-30%, while donor mortality is only 0.1-0.5%. Globally, LDLT poses numerous ethical concerns regarding living donors, such as autonomy, non-maleficence, and beneficence. The donor's comprehension of information is a serious issue in LDLT. The donors may underestimate the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as can ignore the long-term psychological consequences. Furthermore, donor voluntariness may be questionable as the donors may agree to donate under severe family pressure or emotional attachment. We propose open communication with all the donors, ensuring that they should not be subjected to any undue pressure or emotional lability. Donor knowledge and understanding of potential complications and the psychosocial aspect can be augmented by good communication. We also suggest that the donors' education and psychological evaluation should be done in a friendly environment with complete privacy. Interventions should be aimed at improving communication and independent decision-making with the use of e-health educational tools for comprehension assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.