ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
What makes women receptive to breast self-examination, animation, or simulation? - a comparative study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of simulation-based breast health education on breast cancer awareness and breast self-examination skills of Afghan refugee women: a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- Impact of simulated animated video education on patients' disease uncertainty, anxiety, and sleep quality in digestive endoscopy examination.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Advocating for Our Children: An Initiative Utilizing Verbal and Video Education to Increase Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire Form Response Rate.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast self-examination (BSE) plays an important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in India owing to the stigma attached to cancer. The authors compared the efficacies of animation video versus simulation techniques in BSE. Methods: Women with no previous history of conditions affecting the breasts were included in this prospective observational study and divided into an animation or simulation arm. The latter was further divided into three subgroups as per the simulation models used : the German (Delta Healthcare), British (Health Edco), and Indian (low-cost, validated) models used for teaching BSE. The hybrid animation video had a 9 min runtime with a lecture on BSE and a virtual character performing BSE. In both the arms, participants filled in a validated modified patient satisfaction questionnaire. Results: A total of 500 women participated. The mean age of the participants in the animation video arm was 20.21±3.88 years and 19.34±2.27, 22.94±9.6, and 18.97±1.31(20.41±5.99) years in the Indian, German, and British simulation models arm, respectively. The age difference between the two arms was statistically significant ( Conclusions: All models had good efficiency and utility as learning tools for BSE. However, large studies in BSE set up with combination models are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.