Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663530›Full record

ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2023

Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency.

Christian Metzner, Adam Stringham, Brenna Hislop, Joseph Bonham, Larrisa Chatterton, Ryan DeFigueiredo, Steven K Charles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian Metzner *Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-4756-9829
Adam Stringham *Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Brenna HislopMechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Joseph BonhamMechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Larrisa ChattertonNeuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Ryan DeFigueiredoNeuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Steven K CharlesNeuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4637-8482
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

Quantitative Characterization of Essential Tremor for Future Tremor SuppressionR15NS087447 · NINDS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI CHARLES, STEVEN KNIGHT · 2015 to 2021
$868k
NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS087447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigation. Also, prior studies have only used a narrow range of stimulation parameters, so stimulation parameters have not been optimized. Our purpose was to further investigate synchronous submotor stimulation and identify the effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression. Methods: We quantified the effect of brief, synchronous stimulation at 15 different frequencies from 10-150 Hz applied over wrist flexors and extensors on both tremor power and frequency in 20 ET patients. We compared tremor power and frequency from hand acceleration and sEMG between pre-, per-, and post-stimulation phases. Results: Our stimulation paradigm did not result in significant tremor suppression or tremor frequency changes at any tested stimulation frequency, showing no significant interaction between phase and stimulation frequency for tremor power measured by either hand acceleration (p = 0.69) or sEMG (p = 0.07). Additionally, the effect of phase interacting with stimulation frequency on tremor frequency was statistically insignificant for acceleration (p = 0.64) and sEMG (p = 0.37). Discussion: We conclude that brief synchronous submotor-threshold stimulation does not reduce tremor in ET patients, independent of stimulation frequency (from 10 to 150 Hz). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that brief submotor-threshold stimulation suppresses tremor via reciprocal inhibition, which requires asynchronous stimulation. In contrast, it is hypothesized that synchronous stimulation might require longer stimulation durations to affect supraspinal tremor networks. Highlights: We studied the effects of synchronous submotor electrical stimulation over wrist flexor and extensor muscles on Essential Tremor. Our results indicate that suppressing tremor with brief synchronous stimulation is ineffective. Based on recently hypothesized mechanisms of peripheral tremor suppression, we hypothesize that asynchronous stimulation or long-duration synchronous stimulation are more effective approaches to peripheral tremor suppression.

Indexed as

Essential TremorWristElectric StimulationHumansMuscle, SkeletalTremoressential tremorhand accelerationsensory stimulationsurface electromyographysynchronous stimulationtremor suppression

Identifiers

PMID37663530
PMCPMC10473161
OpenAlexW4386382583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.