ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2023
Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.
Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Essential Tremor: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Pooled it
- Peripheral nerve stimulation for essential tremor: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Short-term efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation for essential tremor in a randomized double-blind controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Trial
- Underlying Tremor Improvement with Consistent Use of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation in Patients with Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Methodological Considerations in the Pilot Study of a Novel Transcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation System for Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Shaking Up Essential Tremor: Peripheral Devices and Mechanical Strategies to Reduce Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market analysis evaluated the usage, effectiveness, and safety of TAPS in patients using TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period in a real-world setting. Methods: Study personnel screened a manufacturer's database for TAPS devices that had been prescribed for the treatment of ET and used beyond a 90-day trial period between August 2019 and January 2023. The device logs were collected to extract the therapy usage, accelerometry measurements, and on-board ratings of tremor improvement. Study personnel also evaluated results of a voluntary survey requested by the manufacturer after the 90-day trial period. Adverse events were assessed from patients' complaints reported to the manufacturer. Results: A total of 1,223 patients in the manufacturer's database met the study criteria. The patients had used therapy between 90 and 1,233 days, with average usage of 5.6 sessions per week. Accelerometry data indicated 89% of patients experienced tremor improvement, with an average 64% improvement. 63% of patients rated at least half of their sessions as improved. No significant habituation was observed in patients who used therapy for more than one year. Approximately 62% of survey respondents either had reduced medication or planned to consult physicians about their medication usage. No serious safety events were reported, and 10% of patients reported minor safety complaints. Discussion: The analysis demonstrates the real-world effectiveness and safety of TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period over a longer timeframe and in a larger population size than previously published evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.