Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663529›Full record

ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2023

Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.

Chiahao Lu, Dhira Khosla, Alexander Kent, Helen M Bronte-Stewart, Kathryn H Rosenbluth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shaking Up Essential Tremor: Peripheral Devices and Mechanical Strategies to Reduce Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiahao LuCala Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6356-7253
Dhira KhoslaCala Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-1871
Alexander KentCala Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3124-4150
Helen M Bronte-StewartStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1839-4541
Kathryn H RosenbluthCala Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7923-0559
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market analysis evaluated the usage, effectiveness, and safety of TAPS in patients using TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period in a real-world setting. Methods: Study personnel screened a manufacturer's database for TAPS devices that had been prescribed for the treatment of ET and used beyond a 90-day trial period between August 2019 and January 2023. The device logs were collected to extract the therapy usage, accelerometry measurements, and on-board ratings of tremor improvement. Study personnel also evaluated results of a voluntary survey requested by the manufacturer after the 90-day trial period. Adverse events were assessed from patients' complaints reported to the manufacturer. Results: A total of 1,223 patients in the manufacturer's database met the study criteria. The patients had used therapy between 90 and 1,233 days, with average usage of 5.6 sessions per week. Accelerometry data indicated 89% of patients experienced tremor improvement, with an average 64% improvement. 63% of patients rated at least half of their sessions as improved. No significant habituation was observed in patients who used therapy for more than one year. Approximately 62% of survey respondents either had reduced medication or planned to consult physicians about their medication usage. No serious safety events were reported, and 10% of patients reported minor safety complaints. Discussion: The analysis demonstrates the real-world effectiveness and safety of TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period over a longer timeframe and in a larger population size than previously published evidence.

Indexed as

Essential TremorAccelerometryFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTremoressential tremorperipheral neuromodulationreal-world evidenceremote monitoringtranscutaneous afferent patterned stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37663529
PMCPMC10473165
OpenAlexW4386255175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.