Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663444›Full record

ArticleAutism in adulthood2023

Toward Autism-Friendly Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Exploring Autistic Individuals' Experiences of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans in the United Kingdom, a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Nikolaos Stogiannos, Jane M Harvey-Lloyd, Andrea Brammer, Karen Cleaver, Jonathan P McNulty, Cláudia Sá Dos Reis, Barbara Nugent, Clare Simcock, Tracy O'Regan, Dermot Bowler and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism in adulthood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. EEG neurosubtyping of infants predicts language trajectories.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nikolaos StogiannosDivision of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-6631
Jane M Harvey-LloydSchool of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk, Suffolk, United Kingdom.
Andrea BrammerManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karen CleaverFaculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P McNultySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cláudia Sá Dos ReisSchool of Health Sciences, HESAV, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-4460
Barbara NugentDivision of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Clare SimcockGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tracy O'ReganThe Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom.
Dermot BowlerAutism Research Group, Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sophia ParveenCommunity Involvement, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Keith MaraisCommunity Involvement, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Georgia PavlopoulouAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.
Chris PapadopoulosInstitute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
Sebastian B GaiggAutism Research Group, Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Christina MalamateniouDivision of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autistic individuals might undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination for clinical concerns or research. Increased sensory stimulation, lack of appropriate environmental adjustments, or lack of streamlined communication in the MRI suite may pose challenges to autistic patients and render MRI scans inaccessible. This study aimed at (i) exploring the MRI scan experiences of autistic adults in the United Kingdom; (ii) identifying barriers and enablers toward successful and safe MRI examinations; (iii) assessing autistic individuals' satisfaction with MRI service; and (iv) informing future recommendations for practice improvement. Methods: We distributed an online survey to the autistic community on social media, using snowball sampling. Inclusion criteria were: being older than 16, have an autism diagnosis or self-diagnosis, self-reported capacity to consent, and having had an MRI scan in the United Kingdom. We used descriptive statistics for demographics, inferential statistics for group comparisons/correlations, and content analysis for qualitative data. Results: We received 112 responses. A total of 29.6% of the respondents reported not being sent any information before the scan. Most participants (68%) confirmed that radiographers provided detailed information on the day of the examination, but only 17.1% reported that radiographers offered some reasonable environmental adjustments. Only 23.2% of them confirmed they disclosed their autistic identity when booking MRI scanning. We found that quality of communication, physical environment, patient emotions, staff training, and confounding societal factors impacted their MRI experiences. Autistic individuals rated their overall MRI experience as neutral and reported high levels of claustrophobia (44.8%). Conclusion: This study highlighted a lack of effective communication and coordination of care, either between health care services or between patients and radiographers, and lack of reasonable adjustments as vital for more accessible and person-centered MRI scanning for autistic individuals. Enablers of successful scans included effective communication, adjusted MRI environment, scans tailored to individuals' needs/preferences, and well-trained staff.

Indexed as

autismcommunicationMRIpatient experienceperson-centered carereasonable adjustments

Identifiers

PMID37663444
PMCPMC10468562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.