Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663434›Full record

Trial reportJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Assessment of Pre-operative Vaginal Preparation for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Michelle Marinone, Jonathan Serino, Stephanie Stroever, Nicole Brzozowski, Andrea Kliss, David Doo, Linus Chuang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle MarinoneGreen Valley OB/GYN, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. (Dr. Marinone).
Jonathan SerinoUSF Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Fl, USA. (Mr. Serino).
Stephanie StroeverDepartment of Medical Education and Clinical Research Institute, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA. (Dr. Stroever).
Nicole BrzozowskiDepartments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Danbury Hospital of Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, USA. (Drs. Brzozowski, Doo, and Chuang).
Andrea KlissPerformance Improvement- Quality, Danbury Hospital of Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, USA. (Ms. Kliss).
David Doo
Linus Chuang
Danbury Hospital · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Determine the difference in microbial growth from the vagina and uterine manipulator among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy after randomization to one of three vaginal preparation solutions (10% Povidone-iodine, 2% Chlorhexidine, or 4% Chlorhexidine). Method: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in an academic community hospital. Patients were ≥ 18 years old and scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications. Results: Fifty patients were identified and randomized into each arm. Prior to surgery, the surgical team prepared the vaginal field using 10% Povidone-iodine, 2% Chlorhexidine, or 4% Chlorhexidine, according to group assignment. Cultures were collected from the vagina after initial preparation, prior to the colpotomy, and on surfaces of the uterine manipulator. Bacterial count from the baseline vaginal fornix/cervical canal cultures did not differ significantly among the three groups. There was a difference in bacterial count among the second cervical canal/vaginal fornix cultures (p < 0.01), with the Povidone-iodine arm demonstrating the highest level of growth of cultures (93.8%), followed by 2% Chlorhexidine (47.4%), and 4% Chlorhexidine (20%). There was no difference in growth on the uterine manipulator handle and no difference in vaginal itching or burning was found across the three arms postoperatively. Conclusion: Bacterial growth prior to colpotomy was the lowest with 4% Chlorhexidine followed by 2% Chlorhexidine, the Povidone-iodine group exhibited the highest bacterial growth. There was no difference in moderate to severe vaginal itching or burning. This showed that 4% Chlorhexidine is superior in reducing bacterial growth when used in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPovidone-IodineAdolescentChlorhexidineFemaleHumansHysterectomyHysterectomy, VaginalProspective StudiesPruritusVaginaChlorhexidinePovidone-IodineBacterial growthChlorhexidineHysterectomyLaparoscopyPovidone-iodine

Identifiers

PMID37663434
PMCPMC10473181
OpenAlexW4386406950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.