Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663406›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

Patient portal interventions: a scoping review of functionality, automation used, and therapeutic elements of patient portal interventions.

Kelly T Gleason, Danielle S Powell, Aleksandra Wec, Xingyuan Zou, Mary Jo Gamper, Danielle Peereboom, Jennifer L Wolff

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient Portal Use during Home Health Care at an Academic Health System.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly T GleasonJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4203-6517
Danielle S PowellDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-4450
Aleksandra WecDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Xingyuan ZouDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Mary Jo GamperJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States.
Danielle PeereboomDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Jennifer L WolffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

Consumer Health Information Technology to Engage and Support ADRD Caregivers: Research Program to Address ADRD Implementation MIlestone 13.IR35AG072310 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2021 to 2025
$4.3M
Health Services and Outcomes Research for Aging PopulationsT32AG066576 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CYNTHIA Melinda BOYD, Jennifer L. Wolff · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
NIA NIH HHS R35 AG072310NIA NIH HHS T32 AG066576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to understand the objectives, targeted populations, therapeutic elements, and delivery characteristics of patient portal interventions. Materials and Methods: Following Arksey and O-Malley's methodological framework, we conducted a scoping review of manuscripts published through June 2022 by hand and systematically searching PubMed, PSYCHInfo, Embase, and Web of Science. The search yielded 5403 manuscripts; 248 were selected for full-text review; 81 met the eligibility criteria for examining outcomes of a patient portal intervention. Results: The 81 articles described: trials involving comparison groups ( Discussion: This scoping review finds that most patient portal interventions have delivered education or facilitated collection of patient-reported information. Few interventions have involved pragmatic designs or been deployed system wide. Conclusion: The patient portal is an important tool in real-world efforts to more effectively support patients, but interventions to date rely largely on evidence from consented participants rather than pragmatically implemented systems-level initiatives.

Indexed as

dementiainterventionpatient portalscoping review

Identifiers

PMID37663406
PMCPMC10469545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.