Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663273›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2023

Comorbidity network analysis using graphical models for electronic health records.

Bo Zhao, Sarah Huepenbecker, Gen Zhu, Suja S Rajan, Kayo Fujimoto, Xi Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multimorbidity patterns among fragility fracture patients aged 50 + years in China and the US.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sarah HuepenbeckerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Gen ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Suja S RajanDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Kayo FujimotoDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Xi LuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
Texas Developmental Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI161943 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SCHMITZ, JOY MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$8.3M
Statistical methods for longitudinal integrated mechanistic modeling of multiview dataR01MH126970 · NIMH · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Yi Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Large-scale Network Modeling for Brain Dynamics: Statistical Learning and OptimizationR01EB022911 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LUO, XI · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI161943NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022911NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The comorbidity network represents multiple diseases and their relationships in a graph. Understanding comorbidity networks among critical care unit (CCU) patients can help doctors diagnose patients faster, minimize missed diagnoses, and potentially decrease morbidity and mortality. Objective: The main objective of this study was to identify the comorbidity network among CCU patients using a novel application of a machine learning method (graphical modeling method). The second objective was to compare the machine learning method with a traditional pairwise method in simulation. Method: This cross-sectional study used CCU patients' data from Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care-3 (MIMIC-3) dataset, an electronic health record (EHR) of patients with CCU hospitalizations within Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital from 2001 to 2012. A machine learning method (graphical modeling method) was applied to identify the comorbidity network of 654 diagnosis categories among 46,511 patients. Results: Out of the 654 diagnosis categories, the graphical modeling method identified a comorbidity network of 2,806 associations in 510 diagnosis categories. Two medical professionals reviewed the comorbidity network and confirmed that the associations were consistent with current medical understanding. Moreover, the strongest association in our network was between "poisoning by psychotropic agents" and "accidental poisoning by tranquilizers" (logOR 8.16), and the most connected diagnosis was "disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance" (63 associated diagnosis categories). Our method outperformed traditional pairwise comorbidity network methods in simulation studies. Some strongest associations between diagnosis categories were also identified, for example, "diagnoses of mitral and aortic valve" and "other rheumatic heart disease" (logOR: 5.15). Furthermore, our method identified diagnosis categories that were connected with most other diagnosis categories, for example, "disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance" was associated with 63 other diagnosis categories. Additionally, using a data-driven approach, our method partitioned the diagnosis categories into 14 modularity classes. Conclusion and relevance: Our graphical modeling method inferred a logical comorbidity network whose associations were consistent with current medical understanding and outperformed traditional network methods in simulation. Our comorbidity network method can potentially assist CCU doctors in diagnosing patients faster and minimizing missed diagnoses.

Indexed as

comorbidity network analysiscritical care unitelectronic health recordsgraphic modeling methodmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37663273
PMCPMC10470017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.