Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663219›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2023

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Tooth Mousse Plus Remin Pro and Fluor Protector Gel on Enamel Erosion: An

Kamlakant Shukla, Ashish Saxena, Jaya Joshi, Deepika Jain

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07431736 (Clinical Evaluation of Laser Therapy for Dentin Hypersensitivity), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07431736 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of Laser Therapy for Dentin Hypersensitivity

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsDentin HypersensitivityArmsEr,Cr, YSGG Laser, Waterlase, Biolase Technology Inc., Irvine, CA, ABD, Remin Pro (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamlakant ShuklaDepartment of Paediatrics and Preventive Dentistry, Government Autonomous College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-2676
Ashish SaxenaDepartment of Paediatrics and Preventive Dentistry, Government Autonomous College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Jaya JoshiDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepika JainDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this Materials and methods: A total of 60 sound-extracted permanent incisors were sectioned and enamel specimens were randomly distributed to different groups. The initial weight of all specimens was registered. The samples were randomly divided into four groups ( Results: According to pairwise comparisons in Conclusion: Tooth Mousse Plus, Remin Pro, and Fluor Protector Gel have no significant effect on dental erosion. How to cite this article: Shukla K, Saxena A, Joshi J,

Indexed as

Dental erosionFluor Protector GelRemineralizationRemin ProTooth Mousse Plus

Identifiers

PMID37663219
PMCPMC10474398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.