ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2023
A Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver-based Preventive Restorations (Silver Nitrate, Silver Diamine Fluoride, and Silver Nanoparticles) against
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanotechnology revolutionizing antimicrobial therapy for superbug infections.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Article
- Antibacterial efficacy of nano-silver, nano-chitosan and silver diamine fluoride againstBioinformation · 2026Article
- Nanoarchitectonics for Advancing Bone Graft Technology: Integration of Silver Nanoparticles Against Bacteria and Fungi.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Advances in Regenerative and Reconstructive Medicine in the Prevention and Treatment of Bone Infections.Biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Biological properties of a novel solution based on silver nanoclusters for arresting dentin caries.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The ability of the Materials and methods: Using an Results: There was a significant difference between the negative control and three treatment groups (SDF, AgNO Conclusion: The study concluded that the number of viable bacteria was significantly reduced by all three medicaments ( Clinical significance: The present study thus supports that AgNPs are a promising preventive anticaries agent due to their better antibacterial activity in comparison to other silver-based preventive restorations and can be effectively used as an alternative to SDF or AgNO How to cite this article: Sharma P, Dhawan P, Rajpal SK,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.