ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2023
Combining Radiological and Genomic TB Portals Data for Drug Resistance Analysis.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Interpretable multimodal machine learning for diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of multimodal patient data identifies personalized predictors of tuberculosis treatment prognosis.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) drug resistance is a worldwide public health problem. It decreases the likelihood of a positive outcome for the individual patient and increases the likelihood of disease spread. Therefore, early detection of TB drug resistance is crucial for improving outcomes and controlling disease transmission. While drug-sensitive tuberculosis cases are declining worldwide because of effective treatment, the threat of drug-resistant tuberculosis is growing, and the success rate of drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment is only around 60%. The TB Portals program provides a publicly accessible repository of TB case data with an emphasis on collecting drug-resistant cases. The dataset includes multi-modal information such as socioeconomic/geographic data, clinical characteristics, pathogen genomics, and radiological features. The program is an international collaboration whose participants are typically under a substantial burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis, with data collected from standard clinical care provided to the patients. Consequentially, the TB Portals dataset is heterogenous in nature, with data representing multiple treatment centers in different countries and containing cross-domain information. This study presents the challenges and methods used to address them when working with this real-world dataset. Our goal was to evaluate whether combining radiological features derived from a chest X-ray of the host and genomic features from the pathogen can potentially improve the identification of the drug susceptibility type, drug-sensitive (DS-TB) or drug-resistant (DR-TB), and the length of the first successful drug regimen. To perform these studies, significantly imbalanced data needed to be processed, which included a much larger number of DR-TB cases than DS-TB, many more cases with radiological findings than genomic ones, and the sparse high dimensional nature of the genomic information. Three evaluation studies were carried out. First, the DR-TB/DS-TB classification model achieved an average accuracy of 92.4% when using genomic features alone or when combining radiological and genomic features. Second, the regression model for the length of the first successful treatment had a relative error of 53.5% using radiological features, 25.6% using genomic features, and 22.0% using both radiological and genomic features. Finally, the relative error of the third regression model predicting the length of the first treatment using the most common drug combination varied depending on the feature type used. When using radiological features alone, the relative error was 17.8%. For genomic features alone, the relative error increased to 19.9%. The model had a relative error of 19.0% when both radiological and genomic features were combined. Although combining radiological and genomic features did not improve upon the use of genomic features when classifying DR-TB/DS-TB, the combination of the two feature types improved the relative error of the predictive model for the length of the first successful treatment. Furthermore, the regression model trained on radiological features achieved the best performance when predicting the treatment length of the most common drug combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.