Enhancing the effectiveness of γδ T cells by mRNA transfection of chimeric antigen receptors or bispecific T cell engagers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. CAR-engineering of innate and innate-like immune cells: a new horizon in adoptive cell therapy for solid tumors.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
   Review
2. Rational Design and Organoid-Based Evaluation of a Cocktail CAR-γδ T Cell Therapy for Heterogeneous Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
   Article
3. Advancements in γδT cell engineering: paving the way for enhanced cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.