Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662895›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2023

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.

Zheng Zhao, Yue Jiao, Shuyue Yang, Anni Zhou, Guiping Zhao, Shuilong Guo, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Underwater Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Duodenal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zheng ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Yue JiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Shuyue YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Anni ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Guiping ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Shuilong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Peng LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-2758
Shutian ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-4397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surface of the small bowel mucosa is covered more than any other section of the digestive canal; however, the overall prevalence of small bowel tumors of the whole gastrointestinal tract is evidently low. Owing to the improvement in endoscopic techniques, the prevalence of small bowel tumors has increased across multiple countries, which is mainly due to an increase in duodenal tumors. Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are defined as tumors originating from the non-ampullary region in the duodenum that share similarities and discrepancies with their gastric and colorectal counterparts in the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics. To date, white light endoscopy (WLE) remains the cornerstone of endoscopic diagnosis for SNADETs. Besides, narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques and magnifying endoscopy (ME) have been widely used in the clinic and endorsed by multiple guidelines and consensuses for SNADETs' evaluation. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), endocytoscopy (ECS), and artificial intelligence (AI) are also up-and-coming methods, showing an exceptional value in the diagnosis of SNADETs. Similar to the endoscopic treatment for colorectal polyps, the choices for SNADETs mainly include cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). However, owing to the narrow lumen, rich vascularity, weak muscle layer, abundant Brunner's gland, and the hardship of endoscope control, the duodenum ranks as one of the most dangerous operating areas in the digestive tract. Therefore, endoscopists must anticipate the difficulties in endoscopic maneuverability, remain aware of the increased risk of complications, and then select the appropriate treatment according to the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Indexed as

endoscopic diagnosisendoscopic treatmentsuperficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Identifiers

PMID37662895
PMCPMC10474890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.