ReviewHeliyon2023
3D and 4D printing hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and emerging biomaterials for targeted drug delivery in osteomyelitis management.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Bone organoids and mitochondrial reprogramming.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Engineering Smart Scaffolds for Osteomyelitis: Integrating Nanotechnology, Drug Delivery, and Tissue Regeneration-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Biomedical potential of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: synthesis strategies, characterization and applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Electrical stimulation as an emerging strategy in bone repair: Mechanisms, applications, and advances.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- 3D-Printed PLA/HA Composite Scaffolds: Balancing Mechanical Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing the osteogenic potential of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds via in-situ ZIF-8 surface modification.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- 3D Printing of Hydrophobic API-Infused Alginate-Gelatin Porous Scaffolds Reinforced with TiOACS omega · 2026Article
- Article
- 4D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Bio-Inspired Applications for Dynamic Tissue Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- 3D Printed Patient-Specific Resorbable Bone Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Biological Characterization of 3D-Printed, Sintered Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Scaffolds and Drug Delivery Systems in Treatment of Osteoporosis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bibliometric analysis of hydrogels in bone regeneration: Research trends and future perspectives.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Hydrogel Design: Computational Advances in Synthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Application of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Rheological Insight into the 3D Printability of Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in 3D printing technologies for personalized treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Effect of Hydrothermal Coatings of Magnesium AZ31 Alloy on Osteogenic Differentiation of hMSCs: From Gene to Protein Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Three Dimensional-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Liners for Hip Joint Endoprostheses: A Bioactive Platform for Bone Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The osseous tissue can be classified as a nanocomposite that encompasses a complex interweaving of organic and inorganic matrices. This intricate amalgamation consists of a collagen component and a mineral phase that are intricately arranged to form elaborate and perforated configurations. Hydroxyapatite, whether synthesized artificially or obtained from natural sources, has garnered considerable attention as a composite material in the field of bone tissue engineering due to its striking resemblance to bone in terms of structure and characteristics. Hydroxyapatite (HA) constitutes the predominant ceramic biomaterial for biomedical applications due to its ability to replicate the mineral composition of vertebrate bone. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that the present biomimetic substance exhibits unfavorable mechanical characteristics, characterized by insufficient tensile and compressive strength, thus rendering it unsuitable for effective employment in the field of bone tissue engineering. Due to its beneficial attributes, hydroxyapatite (HA) is frequently employed in conjunction with various polymers and crosslinkers as composites to enhance mechanical properties and overall efficacy of implantable biomaterials engineered. The restoration of skeletal defects through the use of customized replacements is an effective way to replace damaged or lost bone structures. This method not only restores the bones' original functions but also reinstates their initial aesthetic appearance. The utilization of hydroxyapatite-polymer composites within 3D-printed grafts necessitates meticulous optimization of both mechanical and biological properties, in order to ensure their suitability for employment in medical devices. The utilization of 3D-printing technology represents an innovative approach in the manufacturing of HA-based scaffolds, which offers advantageous prospects for personalized bone regeneration. The expeditious prototyping method, with emphasis on the application of 3D printing, presents a viable approach in the development of bespoke prosthetic implants, grounded on healthcare data sets. 4D printing approach is an evolved form of 3D printing that utilizes programmable materials capable of altering the intended shape of printed structures, contingent upon single or dual stimulating factors. These factors include aspects such as pH level, temperature, humidity, crosslinking degree, and leaching factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.