ArticleHeliyon2023
A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted total hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic single-port (SP) vaginal hysterectomy: the first cases in Europe and surgical steps.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- The feasibility and surgical outcomes of robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic single port hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Robotic single port versus robotic multiple port transvaginal orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The Feasibility and Safety of Robot-Assisted Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (RA-vNOTES) for Gynecologic Disease: 298-Case Series.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of hysterectomy outcomes: robotic single-port vs. traditional transvaginal NOTES approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of the learning curve for transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in ovarian cystectomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted total hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). Methods: In this study, the clinical data of 37 patients who underwent da Vinci robot-assisted total hysterectomy by vNOTES between September 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 at the Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, operative postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative pain scores were collected and analyzed. Results: The average age of the patients included in the study was 47.43 ± 4.44 years. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula BMI = body weight (kg)/height Conclusion: The use of the da Vinci robot-assisted total hysterectomy by vNOTES demonstrated safety and offers several advantages. These include reduced surgical trauma, an aesthetic incision, decreased pain, and shorter duration of postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay. These benefits contribute to accelerated postoperative rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.