ArticleHeliyon2023
Predicting sea levels using ML algorithms in selected locations along coastal Malaysia.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In consideration of the distinct behavior of machine learning (ML) algorithms, six well-defined ML used were carried out in this study for predicting sea level on a day-to-day basis. Data compiled from 1985 to 2018 was utilized for training and testing the developed models. An assessment of the multiple statistics-driven regression algorithms resulted such that each tested location was associated with a particular preferred model. The following were the developed best models for their respective study areas: In Peninsular Malaysia, the interactions linear regression model was the best at Pulau Langkawi (RMSE = 19.066), the Matern 5/2 gaussian process regression model at Geting (RMSE = 49.891), and the trilayered artificial neural network at Pulau Pinang (RMSE = 20.026), while the linear regression model was the best at Sandakan in Sabah, East Malaysia (RMSE = 14.054). Other metrics, such as MAE and R-square, were also at their best values, each providing its best values, further substantiating the RMSE respectively, at each of the study areas. These empirical statistics (or metrics) also revealed that despite employing sea level as the sole parameter, results obtained were exceptional better when utilizing a 7-day lag, regardless of the model used. Notably, lag variables with less than a 7-day lag could degrade the model's accuracy in representing ground reality. The study emphasizes the importance of thorough training and testing of ML to aid decision-makers in developing mitigation actions for the climate change phenomena of sea level rise through reliable ML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.