Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662711›Full record

ArticleEXCLI journal2023

Differences in ballistic findings between autopsy and post-mortem computed tomography in the head and neck region of gunshot victims: a comprehensive synthesis for forensic decision-making.

Carlos Antonio Vicentin-Junior, Raíssa Bastos Vieira, Nicole Prata Damascena, Melina Calmon Silva, Bianca Marques Santiago, Eugénia Cunha, João Paulo Mardegan Issa, Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho, Carlos Eduardo Palhares Machado

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EXCLI journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Antonio Vicentin-JuniorGraduate Program in Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Raíssa Bastos VieiraGraduate Program in Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Nicole Prata DamascenaInvestigative Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil.
Melina Calmon SilvaNational Center for the Dissemination of Forensic Sciences, Brazilian Federal Police, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Bianca Marques SantiagoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Paraiba, Paraiba, Brazil.
Eugénia CunhaCentre for Functional Ecology, Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
João Paulo Mardegan IssaGraduate Program in Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Paulo Ricardo Martins-FilhoInvestigative Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Palhares MachadoGraduate Program in Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRFederal Police of Brazil · BRNational Legal Medicine Institute · PTUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID37662711
PMCPMC10471839
OpenAlexW4386407807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.