Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662671›Full record

ArticleHydrobiologia2023

Turning the tide on sex and the microbiota in aquatic animals.

Kieran A Bates, Chelsea Higgins, Maurine Neiman, Kayla C King

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hydrobiologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex Determination in Sponges.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The archaeal classmBio · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kieran A BatesDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-6014
Chelsea HigginsDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IW 52245 USA.
Maurine NeimanDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IW 52245 USA.
Kayla C KingDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ UK.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-based differences in animal microbiota are increasingly recognized as of biological importance. While most animal biomass is found in aquatic ecosystems and many water-dwelling species are of high economic and ecological value, biological sex is rarely included as an explanatory variable in studies of the aquatic animal microbiota. In this opinion piece, we argue for greater consideration of host sex in studying the microbiota of aquatic animals, emphasizing the many advancements that this information could provide in the life sciences, from the evolution of sex to aquaculture.

Indexed as

Aquatic animalsMicrobiomeSex

Identifiers

PMID37662671
PMCPMC10468917
OpenAlexW4229077802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.