Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662661›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2023

Konstantinos Tsikopoulos, Lorenzo Drago, Gabriele Meroni, Dimitrios Kitridis, Byron Chalidis, Fotios Papageorgiou, Paraskevi Papaioannidou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos Tsikopoulos1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece. kostastsikop@gmail.com.
Lorenzo DragoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan 20133, Italy.
Gabriele MeroniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan 20133, Italy.
Dimitrios Kitridis1 Department of Orthopaedic, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Byron Chalidis1 Department of Orthopaedic, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Fotios PapageorgiouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, 404 General Army Hospital, Larisa 41222, Greece.
Paraskevi Papaioannidou1 Department of Pharmacology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The musculoskeletal system involves multiple tissues which are constantly exposed to being exposed to various biological and mechanical stimuli. As such, isolating and studying a particular system from a complex human clinical environment is not always a realistic expectation. On top of that, recruitment limitations, in addition to the nature of orthopaedic interventions and their associated cost, sometimes preclude consideration of human trials to answer a clinical question. Therefore, in this mini review, we sought to rationalize the rapid evolution of biomedical research at a basic scientific level and explain why the perception of orthopaedic conditions has fundamentally changed over the last decades. In more detail, we highlight that the number of orthopaedic

Indexed as

BiofilmIn vitroLaboratory researchMethodology

Identifiers

PMID37662661
PMCPMC10473912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.