Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662648›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Twenty-Year Follow-Up of Cataract Surgery in Car-Drivers: Associations Between Subjective Visual Difficulties and Objective Visual Function.

Eva I Mönestam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development and Validation of a Novel Night-Time Hazard Visibility Test.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva I MönestamDepartment of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 85, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-0474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Driving especially at night is a visually demanding task. Long-time outcome of cataract surgery in drivers is important to study, as many patients live for decades after surgery. The purpose of this study is to longitudinally investigate visual function in active car drivers, 20 years after cataract surgery. Methods: From a population-based, prospective, cohort of cataract surgery patients, initiated in 1997-98, 114 of the 133 surviving patients were included. Preoperatively, postoperatively 5, 10, 15 and 20 years after surgery, the patients answered a visual function questionnaire including driving status and difficulty. Habitual visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and low contrast acuity (LCVA) 10% and 2.5% were measured. Results: The driving difficulties in daylight were almost absent after surgery and did not change over 20 years. Nighttime driving was more difficult and declined longitudinally after surgery, p=0.013, but were at 20 years still less than before cataract surgery. Patients with better BCVA experienced less difficulties driving in darkness, p=0.005. Self-reported problems with glare were significantly associated with BCVA of the better-seeing eye, LCVA 10% and LCVA 2.5% (p=0.046, p=0.033, and 0.024 respectively). Self-reported difficulties with seeing in low-contrast conditions were also significantly associated with BCVA, p=0.004. Conclusion: Twenty years after cataract surgery, most active drivers have no or minor visual functional problems during driving in daytime. Difficulties in nighttime driving are more common and increase significantly over time. Twenty years after surgery, all current drivers had still better subjective ability to drive, compared with before surgery.

Indexed as

car-driverscataract surgerylong-term outcome

Identifiers

PMID37662648
PMCPMC10474870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.