Biological mechanisms of infection resistance in tissue engineered blood vessels compared to synthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.

Objective: Synthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts are known to be susceptible to bacterial infection. Results from preclinical and clinical studies of bioengineered human acellular vessels (HAVs) have shown relatively low rates of infection. This study evaluates the interactions of human neutrophils and bacteria with ePTFE and HAV vascular conduits to determine whether there is a correlation between neutrophil-conduit interactions and observed differences of their infectivity in vivo. Methods: A phase III comparative clinical study between investigational HAVs (n = 177) and commercial ePTFE grafts (n = 178) used for hemodialysis access (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02644941) was evaluated for conduit infection rates followed by histological analyses of HAV and ePTFE tissue explants. The clinical histopathology of HAV and ePTFE conduits reported to be infected was compared with immunohistochemistry of explanted materials from a preclinical model of bacterial contamination. Mechanistic in vitro studies were then conducted using isolated human neutrophils seeded directly onto HAV and ePTFE materials to analyze neutrophil viability, morphology, and function. Results: Clinical trial results showed that the HAV had a significantly lower (0.93%; Conclusions: The HAV material seems to demonstrate a resistance to bacterial infection. This infection resistance is likely due to the HAV's native-like material composition, which may be more biocompatible with host neutrophils than synthetic vascular graft material.