ArticleJVS-vascular science2023
AI-powered assessment of biomarkers for growth prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Forecasting Patient-Specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry with Mixed-Effects Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Pathomechanics, Current Understanding and Emerging Directions: A Perspective for 2025 and Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Sex-specific machine learning classification models improve outcome prediction for abdominal aortic aneurysms.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm classification based on dynamic intraluminal thrombus analysis during cardiac cycle.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Morphology and biomechanical index predict the rupture location and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Stem cell-based therapies for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: development, application, and future potential.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Predicting Aneurysmal Degeneration in Uncomplicated Residual Type B Aortic Dissection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Novel Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.CJC open · 2024Article
- Humans use tools: From handcrafted tools to artificial intelligence.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Article
- Correlation of four-dimensional ultrasound strain analysis with computed tomography angiography wall stress simulations in abdominal aortic aneurysms.JVS-vascular science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to employ biomechanics-based biomarkers to locally characterize abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue and investigate their relation to local aortic growth by means of an artificial intelligence model. Methods: The study focused on a population of 36 patients with AAAs undergoing serial monitoring with electrocardiogram-gated multiphase computed tomography angiography acquisitions. The geometries of the aortic lumen and wall were reconstructed from the baseline scans and used for the baseline assessment of regional aortic weakness with three functional biomarkers, time-averaged wall-shear stress, in vivo principal strain, and intra-luminal thrombus thickness. The biomarkers were encoded as regional averages on axial and circumferential sections perpendicularly to the aortic centerline. Local diametric growth was obtained as difference in diameter between baseline and follow-up at the level of each axial section. An artificial intelligence model was developed to predict accelerated aneurysmal growth with the Extra Trees algorithm used as a binary classifier where the positive class represented regions that grew more than 2.5 mm/year. Additional clinical biomarkers, such as maximum aortic diameter at baseline, were also investigated as predictors of growth. Results: The area under the curve for the constructed receiver operating characteristic curve for the Extra Trees classifier showed a very good performance in predicting relevant aortic growth (area under the curve = 0.92), with the three biomechanics-based functional biomarkers being objectively selected as the main predictors of growth. Conclusions: The use of features based on the functional and local characterization of the aortic tissue resulted in a superior performance in terms of growth prediction when compared with models based on geometrical assessments. With rapid growth linked to increasing risk for patients with AAAs, the ability to access functional information related to tissue weakening and disease progression at baseline has the potential to support early clinical decisions and improve disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.