ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Preclinical Approach to 3D-Printed Osseointegration Prosthesis: Improving Functional Outcomes and Reducing Complications in Residual Limb Reconstruction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Femoral fracture risk in transfemoral amputees with bone-anchored prosthetic limbs during activities of daily living.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- CF-PEEK vs. Titanium Dental Implants: Stress Distribution and Fatigue Performance in Variable Bone Qualities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishment of a clinically relevant beagle model for periprosthetic joint infection with 3D-printed prostheses and multimodal evaluation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Improved primary stability and load transfer of a customized osseointegrated transfemoral prosthesis compared to a commercial one.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Evidence-based recommendation of a powered knee for transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A cross-sectional study.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025Article
- Advantages of customization of osseointegrated implants in transfemoral amputees: a comparative analysis of surgical planning.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- ReliableFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amputee population according to the World-Health-Organization is about 40 million. However, there is a high abandon rate of socket prostheses for the lower limb (25%-57%). The direct connection between the external prosthesis and the patient's bone makes osseointegrated prostheses for transfemoral amputees advantageous (e.g., improvement of the motor control) compared to socket prostheses, which are currently the gold standard. However, similarly to other uncemented prostheses, the osseointegrated ones are at risk of aseptic loosening and adverse bone remodelling caused by stress-shielding. The preclinical assessment of these prostheses has already been evaluated using different methods which did not provide unanimous and comparable evidence. To compare data from different investigations, a clear and detailed overview of the methods used to assess the performance is necessary. In this review 17 studies investigating the primary stability, stress shielding and stress concentration of osseointegrated transfemoral prostheses are examined. Primary stability consists in the biomechanical stability upon implant insertion. Primary stability is assessed measuring extraction force (either with a pull-out or a push-out test) and micromotion at the interface between the implant and the host bone with LVDT (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.