Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662415›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Divergent Folding-Mediated Epistasis Among Unstable Membrane Protein Variants.

Laura M Chamness, Charles P Kuntz, Andrew G McKee, Wesley D Penn, Christopher M Hemmerich, Douglas B Rusch, Hope Woods, Dyotima, Jens Meiler, Jonathan P Schlebach

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura M ChamnessDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-2799
Charles P KuntzDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Andrew G McKeeDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Wesley D PennDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Christopher M HemmerichCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Douglas B RuschCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Hope WoodsDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
DyotimaDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-193X
Jonathan P SchlebachDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0955-7633
Indiana University Bloomington · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Topological Energetics and the Cellular Quality Control of Integral Membrane ProteinsR01GM129261 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLEBACH, JONATHAN PATRICK · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many membrane proteins are prone to misfolding, which compromises their functional expression at the plasma membrane. This is particularly true for the mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor GPCRs (GnRHR). We recently demonstrated that evolutionary GnRHR modifications appear to have coincided with adaptive changes in cotranslational folding efficiency. Though protein stability is known to shape evolution, it is unclear how cotranslational folding constraints modulate the synergistic, epistatic interactions between mutations. We therefore compared the pairwise interactions formed by mutations that disrupt the membrane topology (V276T) or tertiary structure (W107A) of GnRHR. Using deep mutational scanning, we evaluated how the plasma membrane expression of these variants is modified by hundreds of secondary mutations. An analysis of 251 mutants in three genetic backgrounds reveals that V276T and W107A form distinct epistatic interactions that depend on both the severity and the mechanism of destabilization. V276T forms predominantly negative epistatic interactions with destabilizing mutations in soluble loops. In contrast, W107A forms positive interactions with mutations in both loops and transmembrane domains that reflect the diminishing impacts of the destabilizing mutations in variants that are already unstable. These findings reveal how epistasis is remodeled by conformational defects in membrane proteins and in unstable proteins more generally.

Indexed as

EpistasisGnRHRMembrane Protein FoldingMisfoldingProteostasis

Identifiers

PMID37662415
PMCPMC10473758
OpenAlexW4386200365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.