ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Developing and Evaluating Pediatric Phecodes (Peds-Phecodes) for High-Throughput Phenotyping Using Electronic Health Records.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Pediatric patients have different diseases and outcomes than adults; however, existing phecodes do not capture the distinctive pediatric spectrum of disease. We aim to develop specialized pediatric phecodes (Peds-Phecodes) to enable efficient, large-scale phenotypic analyses of pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We adopted a hybrid data- and knowledge-driven approach leveraging electronic health records (EHRs) and genetic data from Vanderbilt University Medical Center to modify the most recent version of phecodes to better capture pediatric phenotypes. First, we compared the prevalence of patient diagnoses in pediatric and adult populations to identify disease phenotypes differentially affecting children and adults. We then used clinical domain knowledge to remove phecodes representing phenotypes unlikely to affect pediatric patients and create new phecodes for phenotypes relevant to the pediatric population. We further compared phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) outcomes replicating known pediatric genotype-phenotype associations between Peds-Phecodes and phecodes. Results: The Peds-Phecodes aggregate 15,533 ICD-9-CM codes and 82,949 ICD-10-CM codes into 2,051 distinct phecodes. Peds-Phecodes replicated more known pediatric genotype-phenotype associations than phecodes (248 versus 192 out of 687 SNPs, p<0.001). Discussion: We introduce Peds-Phecodes, a high-throughput EHR phenotyping tool tailored for use in pediatric populations. We successfully validated the Peds-Phecodes using genetic replication studies. Our findings also reveal the potential use of Peds-Phecodes in detecting novel genotype-phenotype associations for pediatric conditions. We expect that Peds-Phecodes will facilitate large-scale phenomic and genomic analyses in pediatric populations. Conclusion: Peds-Phecodes capture higher-quality pediatric phenotypes and deliver superior PheWAS outcomes compared to phecodes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.