Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37662121›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

The Out-of-pocket Expenditures Incurred during Neonatal Hospitalization in a Public Hospital in Tamil Nadu - A Cross-Sectional Study.

K S Kumaravel, V Anurekha, T Palanivelraja, S Gobinathan, M Gowri, S Ramya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bridging the Gap of Patients' Caregiver Challenges in a Government Tertiary Care Hospital of Maharashtra.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

K S KumaravelDepartment of Pediatrics, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
V AnurekhaDepartment of Pediatrics, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
T PalanivelrajaDepartment of Pediatrics, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
S GobinathanDepartment of Pediatrics, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
M GowriDepartment of Pediatrics, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
S RamyaDepartment of Community Medicine, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For effective policy making, it is important to understand out of pocket costs incurred in neonatal admissions in public hospitals. This cross sectional study was conducted with an objective to estimate out of pocket expenses expended on neonates and attenders during neonatal hospitalizations in a tertiary care referral hospital. Material and Methods: The data were collected using a pretested and semi structured questionnaire in 298 neonates during July'2022. Expenditures were reported as median values with interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Kruskal Wallis test. Result: On analyzing the results, there were no direct medical costs. The median cost spent on food per day, transport during the stay, non medical expenses per day, and total expenses per day were Rs. 300 (IQR 200, 500), Rs. 1000 (500, 1500), Rs. 500 (333, 896), and Rs. 1080 (800, 1533), respectively. Higher expenses were associated with preterm, low birth weight, neonatal seizures, and longer stay (P values <0.001, 0.028, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). About 9.39% and 1% of the families were found to be catastrophic health expenditures at 10% and 25% threshold levels, respectively. Conclusion: To conclude, all the direct medical costs were borne by the caregiver. However, some non medical and indirect costs are associated with neonatal hospitalizations in public hospitals and cash benefit schemes can offset them.

Indexed as

Back referralcatastrophic health expenditureslow birth weightprematurity

Identifiers

PMID37662121
PMCPMC10470577
OpenAlexW4384200493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.