Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37661984›Full record

ReviewNational journal of maxillofacial surgery

Alveolar ridge preservation: A review of concepts and controversies.

Cinthya Quisiguiña Salem, Emilio Ruiz Delgado, Pablo A Crespo Reinoso, James Jerez Robalino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cinthya Quisiguiña SalemDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, México.
Emilio Ruiz DelgadoDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Pablo A Crespo ReinosoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
James Jerez RobalinoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of thickness and height of the alveolar process after tooth extraction is a significant impediment to implant placement, which limits the aesthetic results of many restorative treatments. Alveolar ridge preservation can reduce bone resorption. Knowing how beneficial this procedure is can help clinicians decide if it is worth doing. The purpose of this article is to present a contemporary review of the different approaches to preserving the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. We analyze the alveolar healing process, atraumatic extraction techniques, graft materials, and controversies.

Indexed as

Alveolar preservationalveolar ridge augmentationalveolar ridge preservationatraumatic extractionbone graftimplant placement

Identifiers

PMID37661984
PMCPMC10474543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.