Does the type of medial plate fixation matter for supplemental fixation of distal femur fractures manage with a lateral pre-contoured locked plate? A Biomechanical study.

introductionFixation of distal femur fractures with a lateral pre-contoured locking plate provides stable fixation and is the standard treatment in most cases, allowing early range of motion with a high rate of union. However, in situations, the stability achieved with the lateral plate alone may be insufficient, predisposing to fixation failure. The objective of the study was to compare, in synthetic bone models, the biomechanical behaviour of the fixation with a distal femur lateral pre-contoured locking plate solely and associated with a 3.5 mm proximal humeral locking plate applied upside down or a 4.5 mm helical locking compression plate on the medial side. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 15 solid synthetic left femur samples were used. A metaphysical defect at the level of the medial cortex was simulated. The samples were randomly distributed into three groups equally. All groups received a 4.5/5.0 mm single lateral 9-hole distal femur lateral pre-contoured locking plate. Group 1 had no supplementary plate. Group 2 received a supplementary 6-hole 3.5 mm proximal humeral locking plate and Group 3 received a supplementary 4.5/5.0 mm helical 14-hole narrow locking compression plate.

resultsBoth supplementary plate types used in groups 2 and 3 contributed to increase the apparent stiffness of the construct, but pairwise comparison showed statically significant difference only between group 1 and 3. No significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3.

conclusionBoth supplementary plates might be considered for improving the fixation in distal femur fracture in selected cases.