ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023
[Long-term outcome of macular neovascularization secondary to choroidal osteoma with and without intravitreal anti-VEGF(vascular endothelial growth factor)- treatment].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Faricimab in the treatment of subretinal fluid secondary to choroidal osteoma without definite evidence of CNV.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic choroidal neovascularization.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChoroidal osteoma (CO) is a benign ossifying ocular tumor, which is unilateral in most cases. The CO may cause severe visual impairment, especially in the case of a secondary macular neovascularization (MNV).
objectiveBased on a case series of patients with MNV secondary to CO, the variability of the clinical course with and without intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is presented.
methodsAll patients diagnosed with secondary MNV due to CO between 2007 and 2023 were retrospectively assessed with respect to the clinical course.
resultsIn this study 7 eyes of 5 patients (4 women, 1 man) were diagnosed with secondary MNV due to CO. Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment was carried out in 2 patients with unilateral MNV and 1 patient was treated in both eyes for bilateral MNV. In another case with bilateral MNV, only 1 eye was treated because of fibrosis in the other eye. A further case with unilateral CO and MNV scars at the initial diagnosis was left untreated. Overall, in 3 out of 5 eyes treated with intravitreal VEGF inhibition stabilization or improvement of visual acuity could be achieved.
conclusionIn our case series intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment attained a functional stabilization or improvement in 3 out of 5 treated eyes. In one case of CO-associated MNV fibrosis rapidly developed without treatment. Therefore, the clarification for patients with CO about the lifelong risk for development of a secondary MNV is essential in individual cases for early treatment. As no standardized treatment scheme for intravitreal VEGF antibodies for CO-related MNV exists, the treatment is planned on an individual basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.