Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37661203›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Feng, Yexin Chen, Yan Liu, Lin Lin, Xiujuan Lin, Wenxiu Gong, Rongmu Xia, Jianquan He, Jianwen Sheng, Huimei Cai and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jing Feng *Department of Gastroenterology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, The Fifth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030012, China.
Yexin Chen *School of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, 350122, China.
Yan Liu *Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, 401147, China.
Lin LinXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361101, China.
Xiujuan LinXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361101, China.
Wenxiu GongXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361101, China.
Rongmu XiaXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361101, China.
Jianquan HeXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361101, China.
Jianwen ShengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yichun People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Yichun University, No 1061, Jinxiu Road, Yichun, 336000, China. sjw76@sina.com.
Huimei CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fuzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, No. 190, Dadao Road, Fuzhou, 350009, China. mhcseu@sina.com.
Chuanxing XiaoSchool of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, 350122, China. xiaoxx@xmu.edu.cn.
Xiamen Tobacco Industry (China) · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CNFujian Medical University · CNFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShanxi Medical University · CNYichun University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a treatment approach for ulcerative colitis (UC), a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. To collect and evaluate randomized controlled trials of high quality on FMT for UC, we searched a number of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline, for studies published between the establishment of the databases and March 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis of the studies using Review Manager software (version 5.4.1) to determine the differences in rates of remission and adverse reactions between the FMT group and the control group, utilizing the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to combine our findings. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of FMT in patients with UC were included in the study, in which 580 patients participated, including 293 patients treated with FMT and 287 control subjects. Meta-analysis revealed that clinical remission was significantly better in the FMT group than in the control group [RR = 1.73; 95% CI = (1.41, 2.12); P < 0.00001]; endoscopic remission was significantly better in the FMT group than in the control group [RR = 1.74; 95% CI = (1.24, 2.44); P = 0.001]. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [RR = 1.00; 95% CI = (0.86, 1.15); P = 0.96]. Fecal microbiota transplantation has shown potential as a therapeutic intervention for inducing clinical remission in ulcerative colitis UC; nevertheless, the attainment of endoscopic remission and the maintenance of long-term remission continue to present challenges. Safety concerns persist throughout the treatment process, necessitating the implementation of measures to augment both safety and success rates.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeDatabases, FactualFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansMEDLINEOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37661203
PMCPMC10475461
OpenAlexW4386402106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.