Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37661108›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2023

Periconceptional intakes of methyl donors and other micronutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism may further reduce the risk of neural tube defects in offspring: a United States population-based case-control study of women meeting the folic acid recommendations.

Julie M Petersen, Rashida S Smith-Webb, Gary M Shaw, Suzan L Carmichael, Tania A Desrosiers, Eirini Nestoridi, Anne Marie Darling, Samantha E Parker, Maria D Politis, Mahsa M Yazdy and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M PetersenDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: juliemo@bu.edu.
Rashida S Smith-WebbDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Gary M ShawDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Suzan L CarmichaelDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Eirini NestoridiMassachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Anne Marie DarlingMassachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Samantha E ParkerDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Maria D PolitisArkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Mahsa M YazdyMassachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Martha M WerlerDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
Boston University · USMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USStanford Medicine · USStanford University · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

BD-STEPS II (Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposures) - Core (Component A) & Steps Stillbirth (Component B)U01DD001224 · DD · MASSACHUSETTS STATE DEPT OF PUB HEALTH · PI MITCHELL, ALLEN A, YAZDY, MAHSA M · 2018 to 2022
$6.5M
NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001224NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001226NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001300NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural tube defects (NTDs) still occur among some women who consume 400 μg of folic acid for prevention. It has been hypothesized that intakes of methyl donors and other micronutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism may further protect against NTDs.

objectivesTo investigate whether intakes of vitamin B6, vitamin B12, choline, betaine, methionine, thiamine, riboflavin, and zinc, individually or in combination, were associated with NTD risk reduction in offspring of women meeting the folic acid recommendations.

methodsData were from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (United States population-based, case-control). We restricted deliveries between 1999 and 2011 with daily periconceptional folic acid supplementation or estimated dietary folate equivalents ≥400 μg. NTD cases were live births, stillbirths, or terminations affected by spina bifida, anencephaly, or encephalocele (n = 1227). Controls were live births without a major birth defect (n = 7095). We categorized intake of each micronutrient as higher or lower based on a combination of diet (estimated from a food frequency questionnaire) and periconceptional vitamin supplementation. We estimated NTD associations for higher compared with lower intake of each micronutrient, individually and in combination, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, and study center.

resultsNTD associations with each micronutrient were weak to modest. Greater NTD reductions were observed with concurrent higher-amount intakes of multiple micronutrients. For instance, NTD odds were ∼50% lower among participants with ≥4 micronutrients with higher-amount intakes than among participants with ≤1 micronutrient with higher-amount intake (adjusted OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.86). The strongest reduction occurred with concurrent higher-amount intakes of vitamin B6, vitamin B12, choline, betaine, and methionine (adjusted OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.77) compared with ≤1 micronutrient with higher-amount intake.

conclusionsOur findings support that NTD prevention, in the context of folic acid fortification, could be augmented with intakes of methyl donors and other micronutrients involved in folate metabolism.

Indexed as

Neural Tube DefectsTrace ElementsBetaineCarbonCase-Control StudiesCholineFemaleFolic AcidHumansMethionineMicronutrientsRacemethionineVitamin B 6BetaineCarbonCholineFolic AcidMethionineMicronutrientsRacemethionineTrace ElementsVitamin B 6betainecholinefolic acidmethioninemethylationneural tube defectsone-carbon metabolismvitamin B complexzinc

Identifiers

PMID37661108
PMCPMC10624769
OpenAlexW4385663900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.