Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37661105›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2023

Diet-induced Weight Loss and Phenotypic Flexibility Among Healthy Overweight Adults: A Randomized Trial.

Milena Rundle, Jarlei Fiamoncini, E Louise Thomas, Suzan Wopereis, Lydia A Afman, Lorraine Brennan, Christian A Drevon, Thomas E Gundersen, Hannelore Daniel, Isabel Garcia Perez and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Milena RundleSection of Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jarlei FiamonciniFood Research Center, Department of Food Science and Experimental Nutrition, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
E Louise ThomasResearch Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Suzan WopereisDepartment of Microbiology and Systems Biology, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Hague, The Netherlands.
Lydia A AfmanDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lorraine BrennanUCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Christian A DrevonDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Vitas Ltd, Oslo Science Park, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas E GundersenVitas Ltd, Oslo Science Park, Oslo, Norway.
Hannelore DanielHannelore Daniel, Molecular Nutrition Unit, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Isabel Garcia PerezSection of Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joram M PosmaSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Diana G IvanovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine and Nutrigenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University, Varna, Bulgaria.
Jimmy D BellResearch Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Ben van OmmenDepartment of Microbiology and Systems Biology, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Hague, The Netherlands.
Gary FrostSection of Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.frost@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLUniversity of Westminster · GBMedical University of Varna · BGTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Oslo · NOVitas (Norway) · NOWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capacity of an individual to respond to changes in food intake so that postprandial metabolic perturbations are resolved, and metabolism returns to its pre-prandial state, is called phenotypic flexibility. This ability may be a more important indicator of current health status than metabolic markers in a fasting state.

aimIn this parallel randomized controlled trial study, an energy-restricted healthy diet and 2 dietary challenges were used to assess the effect of weight loss on phenotypic flexibility.

methodsSeventy-two volunteers with overweight and obesity underwent a 12-wk dietary intervention. The participants were randomized to a weight loss group (WLG) with 20% less energy intake or a weight-maintenance group (WMG). At weeks 1 and 12, participants were assessed for body composition by MRI. Concurrently, markers of metabolism and insulin sensitivity were obtained from the analysis of plasma metabolome during 2 different dietary challenges-an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a mixed-meal tolerance test.

resultsIntended weight loss was achieved in the WLG (-5.6 kg, P < 0.0001) and induced a significant reduction in total and regional adipose tissue as well as ectopic fat in the liver. Amino acid-based markers of insulin action and resistance such as leucine and glutamate were reduced in the postprandial phase of the OGTT in the WLG by 11.5% and 28%, respectively, after body weight reduction. Weight loss correlated with the magnitude of changes in metabolic responses to dietary challenges. Large interindividual variation in metabolic responses to weight loss was observed.

conclusionApplication of dietary challenges increased sensitivity to detect metabolic response to weight loss intervention. Large interindividual variation was observed across a wide range of measurements allowing the identification of distinct responses to the weight loss intervention and mechanistic insight into the metabolic response to weight loss.

Indexed as

DietOverweightWeight LossAdipose TissueAdultBiomarkersBody CompositionFemaleHumansInsulinMaleBiomarkersInsulininsulin sensitivitymeal challengesmetabolitesphenotypic flexibilityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID37661105
PMCPMC10517213
OpenAlexW4385647799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.