Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660480›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2023

The dynamic nuclear envelope: resilience in health and dysfunction in disease.

Ayse M Turkmen, Natasha O Saik, Katharine S Ullman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. DNA damage and repair in cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Organelle Communication with the Nucleus.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  10. In Vivo Monitoring of Nucleophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Nuclear Membrane Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayse M TurkmenDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Natasha O SaikDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Katharine S UllmanDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Electronic address: katharine.ullman@hci.utah.edu.

Funding

Dynamic Events at the Nuclear Envelope during Mitosis and InterphaseR01GM131052 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ULLMAN, KATHARINE S · 2019 to 2025
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The canonical appearance of the nucleus depends on constant adaptation and remodeling of the nuclear envelope in response to changing biomechanical forces and metabolic demands. Dynamic events at the nuclear envelope play a vital role in supporting key nuclear functions as well as conferring plasticity to this organelle. Moreover, imbalance of these dynamic processes is emerging as a central feature of disease etiology. This review focuses on recent advances that shed light on the myriad events at the nuclear envelope that contribute to resilience and flexibility in nuclear architecture.

Indexed as

Nuclear EnvelopeResilience, PsychologicalCell Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID37660480
PMCPMC10843620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.