Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660253›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2024

High-quality genome assemblies for two Australimusa bananas (Musa spp.) and insights into regulatory mechanisms of superior fiber properties.

Run Zhou, Shuo Wang, Ni Zhan, Weidi He, Guiming Deng, Tongxin Dou, Xi-Tong Zhu, Wen-Zhao Xie, Yu-Yu Zheng, Chunhua Hu and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Banana breeding by genome design.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chromosome-level genome assemblies ofHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Run ZhouInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China; College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Shuo WangCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Ni ZhanInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Weidi HeInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Guiming DengInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Tongxin DouInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xi-Tong ZhuCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Wen-Zhao XieCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Yu-Yu ZhengCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Chunhua HuInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Fangcheng BiInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Huijun GaoInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Tao DongInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Siwen LiuInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Chunyu LiInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Qiaosong YangInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Lingqiang WangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Jia-Ming SongState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Jiangbo DangCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Qigao GuoCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Ganjun YiInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China. Electronic address: yiganjun@vip.163.com.
Ling-Ling ChenState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China. Electronic address: llchen@gxu.edu.cn.
Ou ShengInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Research, Guangzhou 510640, China. Electronic address: shengou6@126.com.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNGuangxi University · CNSouthwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bananas (Musa spp.) are monocotyledonous plants with high genetic diversity in the Musaceae family that are cultivated mainly in tropical and subtropical countries. The fruits are a popular food, and the plants themselves have diverse uses. Four genetic groups (genomes) are thought to have contributed to current banana cultivars: Musa acuminata (A genome), Musa balbisiana (B genome), Musa schizocarpa (S genome), and species of the Australimusa section (T genome). However, the T genome has not been effectively explored. Here, we present the high-quality TT genomes of two representative accessions, Abaca (Musa textilis), with high-quality natural fiber, and Utafun (Musa troglodytarum, Fe'i group), with abundant β-carotene. Both the Abaca and Utafun assemblies comprise 10 pseudochromosomes, and their total genome sizes are 613 Mb and 619 Mb, respectively. Comparative genome analysis revealed that the larger size of the T genome is likely attributable to rapid expansion and slow removal of transposons. Compared with those of Musa AA or BB accessions or sisal (Agava sisalana), Abaca fibers exhibit superior mechanical properties, mainly because of their thicker cell walls with a higher content of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose. Expression of MusaCesA cellulose synthesis genes peaks earlier in Abaca than in AA or BB accessions during plant development, potentially leading to earlier cellulose accumulation during secondary cell wall formation. The Abaca-specific expressed gene MusaMYB26, which is directly regulated by MusaMYB61, may be an important regulator that promotes precocious expression of secondary cell wall MusaCesAs. Furthermore, MusaWRKY2 and MusaNAC68, which appear to be involved in regulating expression of MusaLAC and MusaCAD, may at least partially explain the high accumulation of lignin in Abaca. This work contributes to a better understanding of banana domestication and the diverse genetic resources in the Musaceae family, thus providing resources for Musa genetic improvement.

Indexed as

MusaGenome, PlantLigninLigninAustralimusa bananasfiberMusaceae evolutionstructural variationsT genome

Identifiers

PMID37660253
PMCPMC10811375
OpenAlexW4386398108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.