Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660179›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2024

Diaphragmatic electromyography in infants: an overview of possible clinical applications.

Anouk W J Scholten, Ruud W van Leuteren, Cornelia G de Waal, Juliette V Kraaijenga, Frans H de Jongh, Anton H van Kaam, Gerard J Hutten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07709988 (A Descriptive Prospective Study of Diaphragmatic Activity in Intubated Neonates Around Extubation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07709988 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Descriptive Prospective Study of Diaphragmatic Activity in Intubated Neonates Around Extubation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsStudy of Predictors of Successful Extubation in Preterm Infants, Extubation Succeeded, Extubation Failure, Preterm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk W J ScholtenDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-1436
Ruud W van LeuterenDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-2544
Cornelia G de WaalDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-3472
Juliette V KraaijengaDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8934-8120
Frans H de JonghDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6052-7504
Anton H van KaamDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-7085
Gerard J HuttenDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. g.j.hutten@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6519
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGD Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm infants often experience breathing instability and a hampered lung function. Therefore, these infants receive cardiorespiratory monitoring and respiratory support. However, the current respiratory monitoring technique may be unreliable for especially obstructive apnea detection and classification and it does not provide insight in breathing effort. The latter makes the selection of the adequate mode and level of respiratory support difficult. Electromyography of the diaphragm (dEMG) has the potential of monitoring heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR), and it provides additional information on breathing effort. This review summarizes the available evidence on the clinical potential of dEMG to provide cardiorespiratory monitoring, to synchronize patient-ventilator interaction, and to optimize the mode and level of respiratory support in the individual newborn infant. We also try to identify gaps in knowledge and future developments needed to ensure widespread implementation in clinical practice. IMPACT: Preterm infants require cardiorespiratory monitoring and respiratory support due to breathing instability and a hampered lung function. The current respiratory monitoring technique may provide unreliable measurements and does not provide insight in breathing effort, which makes the selection of the optimal respiratory support settings difficult. Measuring diaphragm activity could improve cardiorespiratory monitoring by providing insight in breathing effort and could potentially have an important role in individualizing respiratory support in newborn infants.

Indexed as

DiaphragmInfant, PrematureElectromyographyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesRespiratory Rate

Identifiers

PMID37660179
OpenAlexW4386387176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.