Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660107›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Long-term immunosuppressive treatment is not associated with worse outcome in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for septic shock: the PACIFIC study.

Julien Vaidie, Edwige Peju, Louise-Marie Jandeaux, Mathieu Lesouhaitier, Jean-Claude Lacherade, Antoine Guillon, Xavier Wittebole, Pierre Asfar, Bruno Evrard, Thomas Daix and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Julien VaidieRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Edwige PejuService de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Louise-Marie JandeauxMédecine Intensive et Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, CHRU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mathieu LesouhaitierService de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jean-Claude LacheradeMédecine Intensive - Réanimation, CHD Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Antoine GuillonMédecine Intensive - Réanimation, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Xavier WitteboleService de Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre AsfarMédecine Intensive - Réanimation et médecine hyperbare, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Bruno EvrardRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Thomas DaixRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Philippe VignonRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Bruno FrançoisRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France. b.francois@unilim.fr.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Cochin · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRRoche (France) · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcept in a few retrospective studies mainly including patients under chemotherapy, information regarding the impact of immunosuppressive therapy on the prognosis of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock is scarce. Accordingly, the PACIFIC study aimed to asses if immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased mortality in patients admitted to the ICU for septic shock.

methodsThis was a retrospective epidemiological multicentre study. Eight high enroller centres in septic shock randomised controlled trials (RCTs) participated in the study. Patients in the "exposed" group were selected from the screen failure logs of seven recent RCTs and excluded because of immunosuppressive treatment. The "non-exposed" patients were those included in the placebo arm of the same RCTs. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the risk of death.

resultsAmong the 433 patients enrolled, 103 were included in the "exposed" group and 330 in the "non-exposed" group. Reason for immunosuppressive therapy included organ transplantation (n = 45 [44%]) or systemic disease (n = 58 [56%]). ICU mortality rate was 24% in the "exposed" group and 25% in the "non-exposed" group (p = 0.9). Neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis immunosuppressive therapy was associated with a higher ICU mortality (OR: 0.95; [95% CI 0.56-1.58]: p =  0.86 and 1.13 [95% CI 0.61-2.05]: p =  0.69, respectively) or 3-month mortality (OR: 1.13; [95% CI 0.69-1.82]: p =  0.62 and OR: 1.36 [95% CI 0.78-2.37]: p =  0.28, respectively).

conclusionsIn this study, long-term immunosuppressive therapy excluding chemotherapy was not associated with significantly higher or lower ICU and 3-month mortality in patients admitted to the ICU for septic shock.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsIntensive Care UnitsLong-Term CareImmunosuppressive AgentsAutoimmune diseasesImmunosuppression therapyIntensive care unitMortalityOrgan transplantationSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID37660107
PMCPMC10475175
OpenAlexW4386387876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.