Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660049›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Rescue of dendritic cells from glycolysis inhibition improves cancer immunotherapy in mice.

Sahil Inamdar, Abhirami P Suresh, Joslyn L Mangal, Nathan D Ng, Alison Sundem, Christopher Wu, Kelly Lintecum, Abhirami Thumsi, Taravat Khodaei, Michelle Halim and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sahil Inamdar *Chemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Abhirami P Suresh *Biological Design, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Joslyn L MangalBiological Design, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-1066
Nathan D NgMolecular Biosciences and Biotechnology, The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Alison SundemChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Christopher WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological and Health System Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Kelly LintecumChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-2781
Abhirami ThumsiBiological Design, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Taravat KhodaeiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological and Health System Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Michelle HalimChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Nicole AppelChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Madhan Mohan Chandra Sekhar JaggarapuChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Arezoo EsrafiliChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Jordan R YaronChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-474X
Marion CurtisDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259 8, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-6929
Abhinav P AcharyaChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA. abhi.acharya@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2764
Arizona State University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Biomaterials-based metabolic rescue of dendritic cells for vaccine designR01AI155907 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ACHARYA, ABHINAV · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
Local immunometabolism modulating biomaterials for immunosuppressive applicationsR01AR078343 · NIAMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ACHARYA, ABHINAV · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
DMS/NIGMS 1: An Experimental Mathematical Framework for understanding and Controlling Regulatory Delay in Self- Nonself Determination in the Immune System R01GM144966 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PEET, MATTHEW M · 2021 to 2023
$600k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155907NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078343NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of glycolysis in immune cells and cancer cells diminishes their activity, and thus combining immunotherapies with glycolytic inhibitors is challenging. Herein, a strategy is presented where glycolysis is inhibited in cancer cells using PFK15 (inhibitor of PFKFB3, rate-limiting step in glycolysis), while simultaneously glycolysis and function is rescued in DCs by delivery of fructose-1,6-biphosphate (F16BP, one-step downstream of PFKFB3). To demonstrate the feasibility of this strategy, vaccine formulations are generated using calcium-phosphate chemistry, that incorporate F16BP, poly(IC) as adjuvant, and phosphorylated-TRP2 peptide antigen and tested in challenging and established YUMM1.1 tumours in immunocompetent female mice. Furthermore, to test the versatility of this strategy, adoptive DC therapy is developed with formulations that incorporate F16BP, poly(IC) as adjuvant and mRNA derived from B16F10 cells as antigens in established B16F10 tumours in immunocompetent female mice. F16BP vaccine formulations rescue DCs in vitro and in vivo, significantly improve the survival of mice, and generate cytotoxic T cell (Tc) responses by elevating Tc1 and Tc17 cells within the tumour. Overall, these results demonstrate that rescuing glycolysis of DCs using metabolite-based formulations can be utilized to generate immunotherapy even in the presence of glycolytic inhibitor.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDendritic CellsFemaleFructoseGlycolysisMicePoly I-CAdjuvants, ImmunologicFructosePoly I-C

Identifiers

PMID37660049
PMCPMC10475105
OpenAlexW4386391401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.