Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660038›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023

Rapid point-of-care detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in exhaled breath using ion mobility spectrometry: a pilot study.

Florian Voit, J Erber, M Feuerherd, H Fries, N Bitterlich, E Diehl-Wiesenecker, S Gladis, J Lieb, U Protzer, J Schneider and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04556318 (Study to Identify Differences of Exhaled Breath Components Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04556318 completednot on this map

Study to Identify Differences of Exhaled Breath Components Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS) in Patients Tested Positive or Negative on SARS-CoV-2

TypeobservationalSponsorB. Braun Melsungen AGRan2020 to 2021Enrolled396ConditionsCovid19ArmsIon Mobility Spectrometry (IMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian VoitDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. florian.voit@mri.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-6628
J ErberDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
M FeuerherdInstitute of Virology, Helmholtz Center Munich, TUM, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
H FriesB. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
N BitterlichABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Dresden, Germany.
E Diehl-WieseneckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
S GladisDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
J LiebDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
U ProtzerInstitute of Virology, Helmholtz Center Munich, TUM, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
J SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
F GeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
R SomasundaramDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
R M SchmidDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
W Bauer *Department of Emergency Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
C D Spinner *Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services (Germany) · DEB. Braun (Germany) · DEHarvard University · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn effective testing strategy is essential for pandemic control of the novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Breath gas analysis can expand the available toolbox for diagnostic tests by using a rapid, cost-beneficial, high-throughput point-of-care test. We conducted a bi-center clinical pilot study in Germany to evaluate breath gas analysis using multi-capillary column ion mobility spectrometry (MCC-IMS) to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection.

methodsBetween September 23, 2020, and June 11, 2021, breath gas measurements were performed on 380 patients (SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive: 186; PCR negative: 194) presenting to the emergency department (ED) with respiratory symptoms.

resultsBreath gas analysis using MCC-IMS identified 110 peaks; 54 showed statistically significant differences in peak intensity between the SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative and PCR-positive groups. A decision tree analysis classification resulted in a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 86%, but limited robustness to dataset changes. Modest values for the sensitivity (74%) and specificity (52%) were obtained using linear discriminant analysis. A systematic search for peaks led to a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 67%; however, validation by transferability to other data is questionable.

conclusionsDespite identifying several peaks by MCC-IMS with significant differences in peak intensity between PCR-negative and PCR-positive samples, finding a classification system that allows reliable differentiation between the two groups proved to be difficult. However, with some modifications to the setup, breath gas analysis using MCC-IMS may be a useful diagnostic toolbox for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

trial registrationThis study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on September 21, 2020 (NCT04556318; Study-ID: HC-N-H-2004).

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIon Mobility SpectrometryPilot ProjectsPoint-of-Care SystemsSARS-CoV-2Breath gas analysisCOVID-19Ion mobility spectrometrySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37660038
PMCPMC10474630
OpenAlexW4386392552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.